Women today

I read the book Hating Women last week. Good read. Boteach, a rabbi and somewhat celebrity (he has his own show on TLC) speaks as a concerned father of daughters about how females are maligned in our society. Can't disagree with that. He talks about the false empowerment that appears when women talk about how strong they are to appear in Playboy or Girls Gone Wild videos. Also can't disagree.
He talks about how in the past, women were considered superior to men and that it was widely understood that the world needed their feminine influence. Uh - don't think so - women in the past were treated as if they were beneath men, as can be seen by a cursory reading of history. Boteach overlooks the obvious contradiction by saying that society did not implement the belief well, which just seems silly.
He talks about how women need to band together and come against this hostility, speak out against the disparaging images of women, protest against mistreatment. I agree, but I think he is wrong in that it is not just women that need to band together, it is concerned people. Just as many men as women should speak out against degradation, more men than women should take action on some concerns, for as Jackson Katz points out in an interview on his book (which is now on the must-read list) violence against women is fundamentally a male problem, yet we treat it as if it's a female problem, and it does not get better.
It is difficult, too, for women to rally together, as what is there to unite us? The feminist movement failed miserably. I see 2 reasons for this. First of all, feminists themselves insulted, and continue to insult, women who choose to become full time mothers, only giving value to that which men already ascribed value to. Women insisted on the changing of women more than the changing of society's attitudes to women. The feminist movement gave value only to choices that were typically made by men.
Second, the feminist movement became indistinguishable from the abortion movement, and women's rights became defined by abortion itself. This drove a deep wedge in between women in society. While some women felt like they must be like men and be able to not be pregnant in order to be equal to men, others understood that abortion is in fact denying the unborn rights in much the same way that men denied them to women. Feminists missed out on the chance to give dignity to women's procreative power, instead only valued what was a characteristic of men: the ablity to not carry a child. Even today, it seems that the only really huge women's demonstrations are about abortion, which is pretty weird because it's legal. I was at a child care conference where a major Canadian feminist was invited to speak and she chose to speak on women's rights and the victory of legalized abortion. At a child care conference. It would have been funny were it not so unspeakably sad.
So is there a new movement that needs to happen? One that incorporates both men and women, and one that seeks to give dignity to all people, regardless of age or birth status? One that stands up for people's rights and recognizes the inherent dignity of life? One that stands for love, giving and generosity? Then I remembered that that is supposed to be the church.


7 Comments:
Dave and I took the boys to the Royal London Wax Museum. There is a display on rated PG, which we chose to take the boys through. The display was basically, all the ways people died long ago. The Gueatene (Sp?). The blade thing that cuts people in half length wise. You know, that sort of thing. (I honestly didn't think the display was going to be THAT... but it was too alte to turn around once we were there)
Anyway, they have little plaques on the wall that explain the things. And my kids can read.
I had no idea that people killed others in the name of the "Church."
I spent the day explaining to the boys that the people who rant he church were the governemnt. And like all people, they made choices. They chose to kill people in horrendous, hideous ways. And they chose to claim doing it in the name of God.
People make choices. THey make rules. It doesn't mean that is what God intended for His Church. It's saddens me to realize that we (as in people) are so corrupt.
Mel - is that the one in Victoria? Rob and I saw that display when we were there. I found it distrubing at the time, and now I find it even more disturbing that a lot of people go through there considering it entertainment.
I understand the guy saying women were superior .... that in that "Gone with The Wind" sort of deal where men doted on women, rose when they entered a room and women were thought too fragile to do real hard work. I don't think much of society benefited from this thinking, but even though, in a way, this is condesending it could be liberating for the few for which this worked.
Judi, this is so true that the abortion issue and the women's rights issues were glued together. I realized when I was in Kansas City just how "related" they were in my own heart. Fortunately God can set us FREE!!
Yes it was the Wax Museum in Victoria. The rest of the museum was entertaining... but that paticular section was not entertainment in my eyes. If I had known, I would not have taken the boys through there. (I guess I thought maybe it would be wax figures of Frankenstein and so on... not what it was)
This was a great post. Puts into words alot of my own thoughts.
Bev - what has that freedom separate abortion and women's rights done for you?
Thanks, Deanna.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home